AdvancedMathBench: A Benchmark Suite for Advanced Mathematical Proof Generation and Verification· 高级数学基准套件
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on high-school and olympiad-style mathematics, yet their capabilities on advanced mathematics remain poorly understood. Existing benchmarks, however, fall short in both scope and evaluation granularity: they provide limited disciplinary coverage and often rely on final-answer correctness or coarse judgments, leaving the validity of the reasoning process inadequately assessed. To bridge this gap, we introduce AdvancedMathBench, a benchmark suite designed to evaluate advanced mathematical reasoning capabilities. Its core proof-generation benchmark, ProverBench, contains 296 problems spanning undergraduate and doctoral qualifying-exam levels. To provide reliable evaluation of the proofs, we develop a dedicated automatic verification pipeline trained on large-scale expert annotations to produce both correctness verdicts and fine-grained assessments of proof errors, which exhibits strong agreement with human experts on held-out proof trajectories. We further introduce VerifierBench, consisting of 888 model-generated proof trajectories paired with expert ground truth, to evaluate whether models can correctly judge proof validity and provide sound verification rationales. Experiments show that AdvancedMathBench remains challenging for frontier models. On proof generation, the best-performing model, GPT-5.5-xhigh, achieves only 75.8 and 66.1 on the UGD and QE splits, respectively, indicating substantial room for improvement on advanced mathematical proof construction. On proof verification, the best model attains a Balanced F1 of only 65.1, and models generally exhibit low true negative rates, suggesting that critical error detection remains a major bottleneck.
高级数学证明生成与验证的基准套件
- 核心方法
- 构建包含296个问题的证明生成基准ProverBench和888个模型生成证明轨迹的验证基准VerifierBench,开发自动验证管道
- 适合谁读
- 研究者、工程师
- 要解决的问题
- 评估大型语言模型在高级数学推理上的能力
- 关键实验
- GPT-5.5-xhigh在UGD和QE部分的生成表现分别为75.8%和66.1%,最佳模型在验证部分的Balanced F1为65.1%
- 主要贡献
- 提供高级数学证明生成与验证的详细评估标准和工具
- 意义与局限
- 填补高级数学推理评估的空白,促进模型在高级数学任务上的改进;目前模型在证明生成及验证上仍存在较大瓶颈