ai.hackcv
论文精选 65arXiv

Hindcast: Replaying Prediction Markets to Evaluate LLM Forecasters· Hindcast:重现预测市场以评估 LLM 预测者

Forecasters are evaluated by backtesting, which replays resolved questions and grades the probability the system would have assigned before the outcome was known. For LLMs, two channels leak the answer into this test. A model that retrieves can surface reports written after the event, turning forecasting into a lookup, and each new model is trained on data closer to the event, so a question that lay in the future for last year's models sits inside this year's training data. Either way, the test grades recall while claiming to grade foresight. We introduce Hindcast, which closes both leaks by grading a model as if it stood at a chosen past date $t_0$, before the outcome existed in either channel. Hindcast replays resolved Polymarket prediction markets against a frozen snapshot of public Reddit, lets the model read only posts written before $t_0$, and scores each forecast against both what happened and the market's own price at $t_0$, itself a human forecast made from the same past information. Because the cutoff is set per market and the snapshot never changes, the evaluation re-runs on new markets as models improve, without going stale. Once the leak is closed, retrieval still helps most models, but only where Reddit discussed the event beforehand. Where the archive carried only speculation, retrieval hurts.

AI 解读论文

评估 LLM 预测能力的新方法,避免数据泄露影响准确性。

核心方法
提出 Hindcast 方法,通过对 Reddit 历史数据的冻结快照,仅允许模型访问截至特定日期前的信息,重现预测市场的过程,以评估 LLM 的预测表现。
适合谁读
研究者、工程师
要解决的问题
现有的 LLM 预测评估方法存在数据泄露问题,导致无法真实反映模型的预测能力。
关键实验
在已解决的 Polymarket 预测市场上使用 Hindcast 方法,与冻结的 Reddit 快照进行对比实验,评估模型的表现。
主要贡献
Hindcast 方法关闭了预测评估中的两个数据泄露漏洞,提供了一个更公平的评估标准,确保模型是在真正预测而不是回忆已知结果。
意义与局限
该方法提高了 LLM 预测评估的准确性和可靠性,但可能需要更多的计算资源来处理历史数据。适合希望改进模型评估方法的研究者和工程师。
领域:cs.CL作者:Xiao Ye、Jacob Dineen、Evan Zhu
相关推荐

本站内容由 LLM 精选聚合,原文版权归 arXiv 所有 · 摘录仅供参考