ai.hackcv
论文精选 60arXiv

Participatory Moral AI Is Not Neutral: The Invisible Hand of Developers· 参与式道德AI并非中立

As AI systems make more morally loaded decisions across society, one response has been moral preference elicitation. In this approach, researchers poll participants on hypothetical dilemmas and use the aggregated votes to train a policy that an AI model then applies at scale. Before any vote is cast, developers make three key choices in the moral AI elicitation pipeline: feature scoping, voter sampling, and question framing. In other words, they decide which features go to a vote, which voters to include, and how to present the question. These choices are often opaque, undocumented, and treated as technical details rather than normative ones. We examine each of these choices within a common empirical study and show that each can shape the preferences produced by moral AI elicitation. Acros

AI 解读论文

揭示开发者在参与式道德AI中非中立的作用

核心方法
通过实证研究分析开发者在道德AI偏好提取过程中所做的三个关键选择:特征范围、投票者抽样和问题表述
适合谁读
研究者、伦理学家、政策制定者
要解决的问题
现有参与式道德AI方法在特征选择、投票者抽样和问题表述上存在不透明性和潜在偏见
关键实验
在一项常见实证研究中分析了上述三个关键选择对偏好结果的影响
主要贡献
说明开发者的选择如何影响道德AI的偏好结果,提高对此过程非中立性的认识
意义与局限
指出参与式道德AI开发中透明性和责任的重要性,但未深入讨论解决方案
领域:cs.AI作者:Taenyun Kim、Edyta Bogucka、Daniele Quercia
相关推荐

本站内容由 LLM 精选聚合,原文版权归 arXiv 所有 · 摘录仅供参考