Reconciling Process Supervision with Outcome-Based Credit in Agentic Policy Optimization· 代理策略优化中过程监督与基于结果的信用的协调
Outcome-based reinforcement learning provides verified feedback for language-model agents, but assigns trajectory-level advantage uniformly to all decisions, yielding coarse credit over long-horizon interactions. On-policy self-distillation offers finer supervision by re-evaluating sampled behavior with privileged information (PI) available only during training. However, fine-grained supervision is not necessarily fine-grained credit: PI-induced likelihood changes describe how additional information alters policy preference, but do not directly determine how an executable action should inherit the verified task outcome. This creates a supervision-credit gap. Privileged signals may be irrelevant to the current interaction state, operate at a token granularity misaligned with executable deci
通过调整过程监督与结果信用,提高代理策略优化的精度。
- 核心方法
- 结合过程监督与基于结果的信用,利用训练期间可用的特权信息重新评估采样行为,以实现更精细的决策调整。
- 适合谁读
- 研究者
- 要解决的问题
- 解决强化学习中基于结果的监督与过程决策之间的粗略匹配问题,即监督-信用差距。
- 关键实验
- 未提供
- 主要贡献
- 提出了一种新的机制来协调过程监督与结果信用,从而改善代理策略优化的效果。
- 意义与局限
- 该研究有助于强化学习模型在复杂任务上表现更优,但需要更多实验支持其有效性。