Can LLMs Discover Scientific Laws in Real and Parallel Worlds?· 大型模型能否发现科学定律?
Scientific equation discovery has long been central to scientific progress, proceeding through iterative cycles of hypothesis generation, observational testing, and refinement under scientific constraints. As LLM capabilities advance and their role in AI for Science expands, it remains an open problem whether they can genuinely discover scientific laws and how this ability should be evaluated. Existing evaluations, however, often either simplify discovery through synthetic settings or reuse published targets that may already be familiar to LLMs. We therefore introduce SCILAWS-BENCH, a benchmark for scientific law discovery built from published research and real scientific data. It comprises 118 problems drawn from 381 scientific papers, covering 291 candidate laws and roughly 8M real data
LLMs能否发现科学定律及评估方法研究
- 核心方法
- 构建了SCILAWS-BENCH基准测试,包含从381篇科学论文中提取的118个问题和约800万条真实数据
- 适合谁读
- 研究者、工程师
- 要解决的问题
- 探讨大型语言模型是否能够真实地发现科学定律,并提供评估方法
- 关键实验
- 未提供
- 主要贡献
- 提供了评估LLMs科学定律发现能力的基准测试,涵盖291个候选定律
- 意义与局限
- 促进AI在科学研究中的应用,但现有模型可能仍受限于数据熟悉度