ai.hackcv
论文精选 65arXiv

FinAutoRubric: Expert-Guided Automatic Rubric Generation for Evaluating Financial Research Agents· FinAutoRubric: 金融研究代理自动评分

Evaluating finance research agents requires rubrics that reflect expert standards and fix the values correct as of an information cutoff. Expert-reviewed finance benchmarks rely on fixed, per-item rubrics, which are costly to extend and cannot encode each institution's own standard. In FinAutoRubric, experts specify reusable evaluation guidance, while agents and code carry out query-specific rubric generation, review, and validation. This expert guidance governs every agent, as prompts and as rules that code enforces, and a Task Bank of reusable criteria carries it across tasks. In long-horizon loops that follow the expert guidance, a writer agent researches every expected value and a reviewer agent verifies it, and failures escalate to a human. On three expert-authored finance benchmarks,

AI 解读论文

金融研究代理自动评分系统,结合专家指导与自动化生成评分标准。

核心方法
通过专家提供可复用的评估指导,代理和代码自动完成特定查询的评分标准生成、审核和验证。
适合谁读
研究者、工程师
要解决的问题
现有金融研究代理的评分标准固定且成本高,难以适应不同机构的标准。
关键实验
在三个专家编写的金融基准测试上进行了实验验证。
主要贡献
提出了一种灵活可扩展的自动评分生成方法,降低了成本并提高了机构间标准的适应性。
意义与局限
该方法可以提高金融研究代理的评估效率和准确性,但依赖于高质量的专家指导和代理性能。
领域:cs.AI作者:Hoyoung Lee、Suyeol Yun、Jack Haverty
相关推荐
论文精选 65已解读

Simulated Control Evals· 模拟控制评估

Control evaluations measure whether safeguards can prevent an AI model from causing undesi…

领域:cs.AI作者:Jeffrey Olmo、David Zhang、Tyler Tracy
📎 arXiv🕒 10-23 01:26🔗 arxiv.org

本站内容由 LLM 精选聚合,原文版权归 arXiv 所有 · 摘录仅供参考